Showing posts with label social business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social business. Show all posts

Thursday, 11 January 2018

Make the pie bigger

Photo courtesy of Yesica on Flickr

Listen to the needs and experiences of your super-consumers.

How are they using your product differently? What would they love your product to do?

Use them as a way to understand how to improve sales to all your consumers. Find out who in your company is a super consumer of your products. Ask them to help you convert the unconverted. 
 
And get them to tell you what you would need to change to enable you to charge more for your products or services.

-------------------------

Inspired by HBR ideacast 555 'What superconsumers can teach you'

Monday, 11 April 2016

Should we be educating our customers?



To what extent should a business attempt to educate its customers?
 
Historically, many businesses have taken it upon themselves to try and educate their customers about their products and services. From pensions to paracetamol, most products come with some form of impenetrable instruction manual that customers are expected to read in order to understand what they have purchased.
 
Attempts to educate customers often stem from a desire to minimise complaints and bad press by managing their expectations. Sometimes a business needs to educate customers about why their request might not be in their best interest – particularly in an increasingly high tech environment. Those 100-page policy documents might make sense to the underwriters, but they will mean very little to the customer who needs a 1-page summary in jargon-free language.
 
But do these attempts to educate customers work in an era where the customer resorts to an internet search as soon as they have a problem or query? Prior to the Internet (remember that?), the business was the trusted source of knowledge. But the speed at which knowledge is now created and shared makes it increasingly difficult for a business to manage its knowledge effectively.
The employee responsible for doing the educating may themselves never have experienced the problem that a customer is facing, leading to a perceived lack of authenticity. And, rightly or wrongly, the customer often believes that the best person to ask for advice is another customer rather than a representative of the company.
 
The problem of educating customers is just as difficult for B-2-B as for B-2-C. For example, business A may procure a new product from business B, but there is a significant danger that the former can overload the latter with too much training and documentation. However, if business A holds back on educating business B about the full range of options afforded by its new purchase, it may be accused of not delivering value for money.
 
Changes made by third-parties also cause a headache, as Facebook’s decision to start auto-playing videos demonstrated. When a large number of mobile customers found they were suddenly consuming more of their data allowance, they accused their mobile providers of over-charging them. And in some cases, it was the customers who first informed the mobile operators of the problem – the customers were ‘educating’ the business.
 
So do businesses have a responsibility to push information to customers to inform them of such changes? Should customers have to opt in to or opt out of these ‘helpful’, paternalistic communications?
 
Who should be educating whom? How? And for what purpose?
 
In a hyperconnected era, the flow of information between company and customer is dynamic. Knowledge is no longer the exclusive possession of the company: the customer can – and should - educate the company just as much as the company educates the customer.
 
How? This mutually beneficial relationship can be developed by making customer communities as integral to a business as the board, the finance department, and the sales team. Customer communities and forums are a largely untapped resource, and businesses should be employing more open business models to co-evolve with their customer communities - incorporating their feedback and insights into both problem-solving and product development.
 
For what purpose? The answer is: to build confidence. We attempt to educate customers to give them the confidence to make better decisions about our products and services. Our customers can do the same for us - their feedback gives the company the confidence that everything is aligned and working as it should be.
 
The networked era is changing the role of the organisation from an ‘all-knowing parent’ to a ‘trusted advisor’. Trust and confidence are increasingly integral to brand value, and there is great value for organisations in making this transition. But navigating this change requires businesses to treat customers as adults, and be prepared to demonstrate greater trust, openness and authenticity.
Our customers can help to educate us and are prepared to do so, but only if we are prepared to listen and respond with the same objective: to increase understanding and build confidence.
 
Source : The QoE discussions November 2016 Written by Tony Reeves

What do your brand advocates look like?

How is a brand advocate different from a satisfied customer?
  • Satisfied = expectations met. Customer is able to understand the company's offer and easily find a product or service that satisfies their needs.
  • Advocate = expectations exceeded. Customer is unexpectedly surprised by the excellent experience they have had which both satisfies their needs and surpasses their expectations. 
But what does this experience look like? How have we exceeded their expectations? What have we done to turn them from a satisfied customer into an advocate?
 
Jaguar recently provided a creative example of this. They set up a stand and invited people to experience a 'virtual reality test drive' in their F-Type car. But once the headset was on, they were in fact taken for a real high-speed test drive. The result? An experience that greatly exceeded expectations, and some new brand advocates.
 

If we have a clearer idea of what our brand advocates look like, we can work back from this and aim to create more of the experiences that transform satisfied customers into advocates.
 
What does exceeding your customers' expectations look like in your organisation? And how might you leverage this perspective?
 
Many thanks to Michael Sutton for sharing the link to the Jaguar video.

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

Leadership 2.0




While going back over inspiration for previous blog posts I came across this thought provoking presentation about 'Leadership 2.0' by Denise Caron. What is Leadership 2.0? The excellent Social Media Garden report by Denovati has some useful soundbites:

"Leadership 2.0: embracing change, being open to experimenting, demonstrating transparency, working collaboratively and creating dialogue. Fostering a culture of innovation. Open to the voice of the people, stimulating sharing, acknowledgement of expertise" (Denovati, 2013)

And why is it important?

"Use of Web 2.0 will only be successful in an organisation if Leadership 2.0 is in place" (ibid.)

"Collaboration and transparency will be the vital business characteristics that will make all the difference in the digital era. Within organisations, co-operation, as opposed to rivalry, will be the main determinant of business success" (ibid.)

Given the growing social complexity in the workplace due to the exponential increase in use of social tools, you could be forgiven for assuming that management structures would automatically move from the pre-internet model of hierarchy towards one of 'wirearchy' as highlighted by Harold Jarche. But this isn't the case. In fact, the 'social media stuff' is still often the job of the intern - you only need to look at the number of internships currently springing up in which the term 'social media manager' is a key responsibility.

The amount of tacit knowledge in an organisation is a huge source of potential innovation (Cook and Brown, 1999). The ability of social tools to enable senior managers to tap in to this creative reservoir presents significant opportunities for senior managers to maximise the creative potential of their workforce. But the recent Altimeter report into The Evolution of Social Business indicates that "only 34% of businesses believed that their approach to social media was connected to the goals and objectives of the business". And more worryingly, "half of all executives are not informed, engaged or aligned with their company's social media strategies in any capacity".

It's no wonder that tools such as Hootsuite, Yammer and others are experiencing such strong growth. There's a long way to go before social business becomes the norm rather than the exception.


References


Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J.S. (1999) Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organisation Science, Jul/Aug 1999, Vol. 10, No. 4. pp.381-400.

Jarche, H. (2013) Wirearchy.

Li, C. and Solis, B. (2013) The Evolution of Social Business; Six Stages of Social Business Transformation. Altimeter Group 

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Knowledge + knowing = innovation



I've just finished reading a dense yet highly insightful article by Cook and Brown (1999) about the nature of knowledge and its relationship to organisational innovation. Although the article was written in a pre-social media age (hard to imagine now), like any great research it contains powerful insights that are highly relevant in today's world where use of social tools by businesses is growing exponentially. This post is an attempt to interpret aspects of their article and apply it to social business, but I would highly recommend reading the original research (reference at the end of the post).

Cook and Brown argue that there are four different types of knowledge: explicit, tacit, individual and group. Each type of knowledge is distinctly different and each fulfills a function that the others cannot.
  • Explicit knowledge can be understood as "knowledge that can be spelled out or formalised"
  • Tacit knowledge is associated with skills or know-how
  • Individual knowledge is that stored in the minds of individuals
  • Group knowledge constitutes the 'body of knowledge' possessed by a specialist group or community of practice
 
'Knowledge' and 'Knowing' are also understood as two separate concepts, with each enabling the other. Knowledge can be viewed as something that individuals or groups possess, and Knowing constitutes the application of this knowledge in a form of action by groups and individuals interacting with each other and the physical world. In this sense, Knowledge is positioned as a tool of Knowing with each enabling the other.

The key aspect of this interpretation is Cook and Brown's belief that the interaction between knowledge and knowing constitutes a powerful driver of innovation in organisations. Of particular significance is their argument that "harnessing this innovation calls for organisational and technological infrastructures that support the interplay of knowledge and knowing" (1999: 381).

Why is this relevant in the age of social media?


The use of social media tools in organizations can be seen as constituting precisely this sort of infrastructure, as these tools enable employees and managers to access, manage and make use of the "intellectual capital" of the organisation. Implementing a means to access the tacit and explicit knowledge that resides in both individuals and groups enables managers to tap into the creative potential of the workforce. This rich knowledge can then be applied to help the organization generate innovative ideas, products or solutions. The ease with which organisations are able to tap into this creative potential is likely to increase their competitive advantage and ultimately render them more innovative.

The recent report by the Altimeter Group about the Evolution of Social Business suggests that there is a distinct gap between businesses that are implementing a social media strategy and those that are 'deeply integrating social media and social methodologies throughout the company to drive real business impact' (full report below). The research indicated a truly social business has an approach to social which:
  1. is clearly aligned with strategic business goals of an ogranisation
  2. has organisational alignment and support that enables the execution of that strategy.
After surveying nearly 700 social media professionals and executives the research also found that only 34% of businesses believed that their approach to social media was connected to the goals and objectives of the business. And more worryingly, the report uncovered that 'half of all executives are not informed, engaged or aligned with their company's social media strategies in any capacity'.

There is a clear need for senior executives in businesses and organisations to understand the competitive advantage that social tools can leverage. The alignment of social tools with strategic objectives can significantly increase the potential for an organisation to harness the rich creative potential of its workforce. Using social tools, organisations can access the 'knowledge' residing in individuals and groups and turn it into the 'knowing' that can bring real innovation.


References

Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J.S. (1999) Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organisation Science, Jul/Aug 1999, Vol. 10, No. 4. pp.381-400.

Li, C. and Solis, B. (2013) The Evolution of Social Business; Six Stages of Social Business Transformation. Altimeter Group